Director William Wyler’s “Mrs. Miniver” was a popular
and critical success in 1942. It won
seven Oscars, including Best Picture, Best Director for Wyler, and Best Actress for Greer
Garson. This story of an upper-crust British
mother, nobly holding her home, family and community together as Hitler’s bombs
fall around them, is personal narrative on
an epic scale that was Hollywood's specialty. It is one of the great
classics of its era, a big and entertaining movie, that still has a lot to say
in these times of uncertainty.
Watching "Mrs. Miniver" now, more than 70 years later, we can see how accurately the events of the film mirror our physical and emotional concerns during the pandemic. In spite of a few 1940s movie
conventions that a modern audience might ridicule, “Mrs. Miniver” captures the fear of an encroaching disaster,
the anguish of random death, and the sacrifice of strong, generous
people as their familiar way of life verges on destruction.
The Minivers (Garson and Walter Pidgeon) are a privileged couple with two young children. They enjoy the frivolity of buying hats and driving new cars. Their oldest son, Vin, returns from Oxford for the summer, a righteous
activist for the working man; he's like a young Bernie Sanders.
Vin falls awkwardly in love with Carol, the understanding
granddaughter (Teresa Wright) of the neighboring dowager, Lady Beldon (Dame Mae
Whitty). Lady Beldon is conscious of her wealth and her elevated place in society, and disdains those who are not part of her social station.
Soon, during the local church service, the Pastor (Henry Wilcoxon) announces that England
is at war. The genteel, even mundane
aspects of life are about to be lost. Private homes are required to participate in
nightly blackouts, or face steep fines.
Mr. Miniver is recruited to join the fleet of small ships at Dunkirk.
Vin and Carol are married two weeks before Vin enlists as a flier in the RAF. The wealthy
Lady Beldon must extend a hand of generosity to her less-fortunate neighbors,
her mansion filled with provisions for the long haul. Mrs. Miniver holds down
the home front, as she heroically (if improbably) survives a threat from an injured German
parachutist, whom she holds prisoner in her kitchen until help arrives.
The parallels to what we have encountered during our pandemic-- the fear of death, the concern for basic needs, the worry about loved ones we are unable to be close to -- are striking. These concerns are movingly expressed in a monologue Carol delivers to Mrs. Miniver just before Vin leaves for the Air Force. She knows he might not return from the War, and cherishes what little time they have to be happy together. She speaks to the feelings of many who hope that their own loved
ones don’t succumb. In the end, Vin and Carol's love story becomes a cruel and random irony.
The most powerful scene in the movie is a perfect metaphor for the nightmare of the pandemic. The Minivers,
with their two youngsters and the family cat, retreat to their cramped, dimly-lit
bomb shelter, attempting to remain safe and shield the children from fear before an enemy attack. Soon the bombs
explode, getting closer and louder in a frightening crescendo, while the family huddles, cut off from the outside,unable to see what's happening. The fear of the unknown, the claustrophobia of forced isolation,are palpable
to many of us who are also waiting, in uncertain isolation, concerned for our lives.
“Mrs. Miniver” ends
with a sermon, delivered in a damaged church to a decimated congregation as
they mourn the losses of characters we also have come to love. The sermon became world-famous, even cited by
Winston Churchill as having been instrumental in the war effort. “Mrs. Miniver” helped to soothe weary
families, and helped to increase participation in WWII, which America had
entered just before the film was released. It is a moving story, a record of a
bygone era whose basic human concerns are now our concerns. It is well worth a look today.
“Places in the Heart” seems to have little in
common with “Mrs. Miniver”. It is set in small-town Texas during the height of
the Depression. Instead of a privileged
family struggling to maintain a comfortable life amid the ravages of war,
“Places in the Heart” tells a story about a modest family coming to terms with
devastating personal loss and hardship, and a portrait of a community of the
poor and dispossessed, who have very little and are in danger of losing even
that.
Sally Field, who won her second Oscar here (in her famous
“You like me” speech), plays Edna Spalding, the wife of the small-town
sheriff. When her husband is killed by a
young black man in a freak accident, the townspeople lynch and kill the
perpetrator. Left alone, with no skills,
little money to pay her mortgage, and an untended cotton field, she is forced
to take in a boarder, Mr. Will, a blind chairmaker (John Malkovich) to make
ends meet.
Modern audiences, especially those suffering the anxieties of job loss, diminished life savings, and empty store shelves, might identify more with “Places in the Heart” at first glance.
Modern audiences, especially those suffering the anxieties of job loss, diminished life savings, and empty store shelves, might identify more with “Places in the Heart” at first glance.
Looking at both films now, it’s possible to find their common elements. Like “Mrs. Miniver”, Mrs. Spalding has two small children
for whom she must struggle to support. She is also respected by her friends in
the community; they are sympathetic to her plight and try to help her in whatever small ways they can. Like "Mrs.
Miniver", the church is a center of gathering and support. Both films end with a sermon.
Unlike “Mrs. Miniver”, whose community rallies together to
fight against a common evil, the world of “Places in the Heart” is polarized,
and the hardships the characters must endure are exacerbated by conflict—in
this case, racism.
When a black vagrant named Moses (Danny Glover) comes
begging for food, Mrs. Spalding takes him in, and together they hatch a plan to
win the annual prize-money for delivering the first cotton crop to the
gin. This quietly eventful movie observes how Edna and her children, Mr. Will, Moses, and a community
of black workers, struggle against time, weather, and the Ku Klux Klan, to earn enough prize money to survive just a little longer. In between are
subplots involving extended families, infidelities, and natural disasters.
A sequence with a direct parallel to “Mrs. Miniver is a well-filmed tornado scene, which takes place inside the
Spalding’s storm cellar. Like the Minivers’
bomb shelter, the storm cellar is small, cramped, isolated, and shaken with the
frightening sounds of approaching destruction. Once again, the fear of the unknown as we are confined and cut off from friends and community, is effectively portrayed. Afterward, the damage is
assessed--as we know will be the case when this virus subsides—and life comes
slowly back to normal, although everything has changed.
“Places in the Heart” is a movie of
small moments and a few impressive set pieces, that build to a powerful fadeout. While the finale of “Mrs. Miniver” stirs people to action, the
concluding sequence of “Places in the Heart” invites reflection and personal
introspection. The sermon heard at the
end of this film is about forgiveness, and about love rather than about meeting
a conflict with force.
As the sermon ends, and communion is passed from person to
person, the camera follows in an intricate pattern. Soon we are struck by the faces
of both heroes and villains, and of those we thought had gone forever. As the chorus swells with a familiar hymn,
the camera settles on the faces of two characters, and fades out.
What just happened? What does this mean? This one complex shot takes “Places in the
Heart” from a conventionally humanistic story into the realm of something metaphorical,
spiritual, even surreal.
It was one of the few experiences I have had at a movie when
I sat there, overcome, going back over the entire movie in my head to
understand my reaction.
Like a poem, the end defies description, its meaning more
emotional than rational.
As we find ourselves stuck inside of our homes for weeks or
months, as our worlds are shrinking, as we are unable to partake in activities that once
gave us a sense of purpose and accomplishment, even meaning, we are left to review our lives to this point, with that mixture of awe and contemplation that we may feel at the
end of “Places in the Heart”.
This is a great piece of writing. Keen observations about a film that effectively walks the line between tragedy and comedy. Definitely worth a second look now, as we teeter in the trauma of this global pandemic.
ReplyDelete